Justice or Just-Us? The Drama of Fairness and the Spirit of Service in Modern Academia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63163/jpehss.v3i4.1316Keywords:
Organizational Justice, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, FacultyAbstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the influence of Organizational Justice on Organizational Citizenship Behavior amid Private sector and public sector Universities Faculty in Karachi, Sindh. The sample size consists of 300 faculty members, in which 156 respondents were from private sector universities and 144 respondents were from public sector universities. To measure organizational Justice Scale (Colquitt’s (2001) was used and Organizational Citizenship Behavior was assessed by using the Podsakoff et al.’s (1990) five factor model of OCB. The data was analyzed by using Linear Regression model. The findings of the study suggest that Organizational Justice influence on organizational citizenship behavior amid private and public universities faculty. The findings of the study will be helpful for universities, policy makers, psychologist, scholars and researchers in making better strategies to develop for faculty in creating citizenship behavior by providing fair and equitable working environment.
References
Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extra-role performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221.
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A fi eld study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California management review, 40(1), 39-58.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Barrett, A. M. (2011). An education Millennium Development Goal for quality: complexity and democracy. Compare, 41(1), 145-148.
Borghini,S. (2005) “Organizational creativity: breaking equilibrium and order to innovate”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 Issue: 4, pp.19 – 33.
Choi, J. N. (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(4), 467-484.
Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a living: how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
Duff, G. C., & Galyean, M. L. (2007). Board-invited review: recent advances in management of highly stressed, newly received feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 85(3), 823-840.
Florida, R. (2002). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American geographers, 92(4), 743-755.
Govt. of Pakistan (1998 a) “The Ninth Five Year Plan (1998-2003)” Ministry of Education,
Islamabad.
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59-68.
Grigorenko, E. L. (2019). Creativity: a challenge for contemporary education. Comparative Education, 55(1), 116-132.
Gunter, B., & Furnham, A. (1996). Biographical and climate predictors of job satisfaction and pride in organization. The Journal of psychology, 130(2), 193-208.
Hackman, J. R. (1977). Work design. In J. R. Hackman & J. L. Suttle (Eds.), Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change (pp. 96-162). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
Katz D, Kahn RL (1966). The Social Psychology of Organization. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Katz, D. 1964. Motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9: 131–146.
Kylen,F.S. & Shani,A.B(2002). Tigering Creativity in Teams: An Exploratory Investigation, Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), pp.17-30.
Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California management review, 40(3), 112-132
McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246.
Medley, D. M., & Shanon, D. M. (1994). Teacher Evaluation in T. Husen and TN Postlethwaite (eds), the international Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd ed, Vol X.
Michael J. (2011) Long-term effects of the demographic transition on family and kinship networks in Britain. Population and Development Review, 37 (S1). pp. 55-80. ISSN 1728-4457.
Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19.
Niazi, H. K., & Mace, J. (2006). The contribution of the private sector to higher education in Pakistan with particular reference to efficiency and equity. Bulletin of Education & Research, 28(2), 17-42
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human performance, 10(2), 133-151.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Sallis, E. (2002). Total Quality Management in Education. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580−607.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Angle, H. L. (1989). An introduction to the Minnesota innovation research program. Research on the management of innovation, 3-30.
