Evaluation of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Cultivars and Their Mutants in Response to Chromium Toxicity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63163/jpehss.v4i1.1280Keywords:
Chromium toxicity; Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.); Heavy metal stress; Oxidative stress; Antioxidant enzymes; Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Morphological traits; Biochemical responses; Genotypic variation; Stress tolerance.Abstract
Chromium metal pollution is extremely harmful to plant growth as well as environmentally sustainable conditions. Therefore, an experiment was designed to investigate the impact of chromium stress on morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Chromium treatment at a dose of 20 mg kg⁻¹ was given through soil medium to investigate the effects. Ten chickpea cultivars including parents along with mutant genotypes were utilized in the experiment which was conducted in CRD technique. It was found that growth attributes, namely shoot length, root length, and biomass, were greatly affected by chromium-induced stress in both parents and mutants. Chlorophyll pigments, including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll, were highly suppressed in the presence of chromium. On the other hand, oxidative stress parameters such as the content of reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and antioxidant enzymes, including CAT, POD, and APX, were highly elevated. Moreover, osmoprotectants and secondary metabolites like proline, total soluble sugars, phenols, and flavonoids showed variation between different cultivars, suggesting different tolerance strategies. There were statistically significant variations between different treatments and cultivars, where the chromium stress had highly significant impacts on most of the investigated characters at 5 percent probability level. In summary, the results indicate that chromium toxicity is associated with generation of oxidative stress in plants and inhibits their growth, and that the improved antioxidant defense system plays a key role in conferring stress resistance to some chickpea varieties.
References
Ashraf, M. A., Rasheed, R., Hussain, I., Shad, M. I., & Nazim, W. (2023). Taurine protected Trifolium alexandrinum L. plants from damages of individual and interactive effects of chromium and drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 45(9), 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03583-y
Emamverdian, A., Ding, Y., Mokhberdoran, F., & Xie, Y. (2015). Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. The scientific world journal, 2015(1), 756120. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/756120
Gill, M. (2014). Heavy metal stress in plants: a review. Int J Adv Res, 2(6), 1043-1055.
Rehman, M. Z. U., Rizwan, M., Ghafoor, A., Naeem, A., Ali, S., Sabir, M., & Qayyum, M. F. (2015). Effect of inorganic amendments for in situ stabilization of cadmium in contaminated soils and its phyto-availability to wheat and rice under rotation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(21), 16897-16906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4883-y
Singh D, Sharma NL, Singh CK, Sarkar SK, Singh I, Dotaniya ML (2020) Effect of chromium (VI) toxicity on morpho-physiological characteristics, yield, and yield components of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. PLoS ONE 15(12):e0243032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243032
Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., & Dubey, R. S. (2024). Enhancing phytoremediation efficacy in plants cultivated in heavy metal-contaminated soil under drought stress: Understanding plant responses and genetic engineering strategies. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 235(7), 451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07239-6
Yeboah, E., Asamoah, G., Ofori, P., Amoah, B., & Agyeman, K. O. A. (2020). Method of biochar application affects growth, yield and nutrient uptake of cowpea. Open Agriculture, 5(1), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0040
Adrees M, Ali S, Iqbal M, Aslam Bharwana S, Siddiqi Z, Farid M, et al. Mannitol alleviates chromium toxicity in wheat plants in relation to growth, yield, stimulation of anti-oxidative enzymes, oxidative stress and Cr uptake in sand and soil media. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015; 122:1–8. pmid:26164268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341
