Perspective of Speech and language Pathologist Regarding Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices for the Improvement of Language Development in Children withIntellectual Disability

Authors

  • Sasha Khalid M.S Speech and Language Pathology, Riphah International University Islamabad, Punjab, Pakistan, Email: Sashakhalid098@gmail.com Author
  • Syeda Mariam Zahra MS speech and language Pathology, Riphah international university, Email: mariam.zahra@riphah.edu.pk Author
  • Saman Fatima M.S Speech and Language Pathology, Riphah International University Islamabad, Punjab, Pakistan, Email: samanfatima798@gmail.com Author
  • Muhammad Kashif (JSET), PhD Scholar, Department of Special Education, Division of Education, University of Education, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan (Corresponding Author) Email: muhammad.akashifi@gmail.com Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63163/jpehss.v4i1.1064

Keywords:

Augmentative and Alternative Communication; Speech-Language Pathologists; Intellectual Disability; Language Development; Early Intervention; Pakistan

Abstract

 Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) includes strategies and devices that support
or replace spoken language for individuals with communication difficulties. It plays a significant
role in promoting functional communication and language development in children with complex
needs. This quantitative cross-sectional study explored Speech-Language Pathologists’ (SLPs)
perspectives on AAC devices for improving language development in children with intellectual
disability in Lahore. Using purposive sampling, 277 SLPs completed the 15-item Role of AAC in
Intellectually Disabled Children (RAAC) questionnaire. Findings showed strong agreement that
AAC compensates for expressive language impairments (M = 4.59) and enhances receptive skills
(M = 4.01), while most disagreed that AAC impedes speech (M = 2.58, reverse-coded). AAC was
also perceived to improve independence and overall lifestyle (M = 4.46) and prevent severe
language delay when introduced early (M = 4.53). Female SLPs reported significantly higher
perception scores than males across domains (p < .05). 

Downloads

Published

2026-03-21